9:30-11a.m., Bricker 200
AGENDA
Updates from the Chair
Approval of meeting minutes
Changes to Surveying Minor - Ed McCaul, Carolyn Merry
Food Processing and Food Safety Minors - Jill Pfister
ASC 3 - Jay Yutzey, John Wanzer
CCI Assessment/University Oversight Committee - Randy Smith
Assessment process update - Alexis Collier
Use of Minors - Bill Childs
Present: Adelson, Baker, Childs, Harder, Lemberger, Oltmann, Ryden, Shanda, Trudeau, Vasey, Wyszomirski, Yerkes, Andereck, Breitenberger, Collier, Lowry, Mockabee, Mumy, Mercerhill, Schoen, Smith, Wanzer, Francis
NOTE: CAA is going to look into how we can streamline minor processing so that CCI doesn’t review things after CAA
NOTE: OAA is currently exploring dual degree options and requirements
i. Committee would not review course proposals
ii. Structure would be tried for one year, and then reviewed/fine-tuned as needed
i. Discussion of adding “assessment” to name
ii. Committee would advise, not dictate – put “advisory” in name
i. OAA will research how they can provide support
ii. Charge will be folded out slowly
i. Concern over whether that would accomplish what non-ASC Colleges desire/need expressed
ii. It is important for ASC to hear how Professional Colleges’ professions are changing and how it affects their needs
iii. Suggestion to change charge language to reflect advisory role and ensure reports get back to CCI
iv. Recommended that committee start with agenda setting, and allow that to guide assessment gathering
i. Language will be changed regarding student petitions so that it does not come across like a PSP
ii. 25% of graduates last spring had minors
iii. Question of how many double-majors there are – estimated 500-600, numbers available on intranet
iv. Question of if there will be a limit to how many courses overlap with GEC
v. Question of how requiring minors might affect students who do not know what they want to study
vi. Exploring, Redeciding and Transfer students need to be taken care of separately
vii. Hope is that the requirement will help student focus, not attempt to slow students up
viii. Designed to get students to talk to faculty about their passions/interests
ix. Question of what is wrong with allowing students to take courses in various departments without requiring structure
i. Members asked to discuss proposal in their departments/colleges and send thoughts to Bill and Ed