ASCnet

Engineering 360 – sent back

1. Answer GEC writing course guideline #4 and #5 ( OM p.36)-- writing component not substantial as a writing course. (4. How do the written assignments fit the objectives of the Historical Study category? 5. How will students sharpen communication skills through the preparation of essay exams and papers and through participation in discussion in this course?)
2. Changes needed:

                                                               i.      Need grading scale—what is an A?

                                                             ii.      Remove course assessment plan from both syllabi and further develop the plan.

                                                            iii.      Fix typo: 360.01 on p.4 (2^nd bullet point under “How to Succeed”), and 360.02 on p.4 (1^st line under “Patent research paper”), p.5 (2^nd bullet point under “How to Succeed”).

                                                           iv.      Explain the assignments

3. Suggestions and other concerns:

                                                               i.      Infringes on Breadth? Would it be interested for non-engineering students?

                                                             ii.      Is Prof’s CV part of the syllabi?

                                                            iii.      Is extensive disability statement an ABET requirement?

                                                           iv.      Requiring three textbooks (360.02) could be unaffordable for students.

                                                             v.      The enrollment capacity seems small to be a GEC course.